By Our Special Correspondent

The question is deceptively simple, yet its answer carries the weight of generations: What should an Oromo person know before participating in and contributing to the Oromo struggle?

In the current climate of heightened political consciousness, young Oromos—and indeed, Oromos of all ages—are increasingly drawn to the movement for recognition, justice, and self-determination. The passion is palpable. The urgency is real. Yet, passion without preparation is a recipe for disillusionment, and urgency without understanding can lead to fragmentation.

To participate meaningfully in the Oromo struggle is to undertake an ordeal of the informed. It requires more than emotion; it demands historical literacy, strategic clarity, ethical grounding, and profound personal readiness.

—

The Burden of History: Knowing Where You Stand

The first and most critical requirement is a deep, unflinching engagement with Oromo history. The struggle did not begin yesterday, nor will it end tomorrow. It is a continuum stretching from the 16th-century expansions, through the colonial-era subjugation of the 19th century, to the suppression of the Mecha and Tulema self-help association in the 1960s, and into the armed and civil resistance movements of the modern era.

An informed participant must understand the 1974–1991 armed struggle, the subsequent political transitions, and the unfulfilled promises of the 1991 transitional charter. They must grapple with the complex legacy of the Oromo Liberation Front (OLF), the rise of the Qeerroo movement, and the ongoing debates about federalism versus confederalism, or reform versus revolution.

Without this historical grounding, one risks repeating mistakes, falling prey to opportunistic narratives, and confusing tactical setbacks with strategic defeat.

—

The Identity Question: What Does Oromummaa Mean?

Beyond history lies the deeper question of identity. What does it mean to be Oromo in the 21st century? Oromummaa—the essence of Oromoness—is often invoked but rarely examined.

The informed participant knows that Oromummaa is not a fortress of ethnic exclusivity. Historically, the Oromo nation has been remarkably inclusive, absorbing and assimilating diverse groups through the Gadaa system. The Oromo struggle, at its most principled, has never been about the domination of others but about the liberation of the self and the renegotiation of Ethiopia’s political compact.

The participant must therefore guard against the dangerous slippage from self-determination to ethnic supremacy. The struggle’s moral authority derives from its demand for justice, not its assertion of superiority. An Oromo who participates without understanding this distinction may find themselves perpetuating the very cycles of marginalization they seek to end.

—

Strategic Literacy: Understanding the Political Terrain

The Oromo struggle operates within a complex federal system, characterized by overlapping jurisdictions, competing nationalisms, and a federal government that views regional assertiveness with suspicion.

An effective participant must understand the constitutional framework—its strengths and its profound weaknesses. They must know the difference between Article 39 (the right to self-determination) and the practical mechanisms for its implementation. They must comprehend the limits of regional power, the manipulation of ethnic federalism by federal actors, and the ways in which the current system simultaneously empowers and constrains the Oromo nation.

Strategic literacy also demands an understanding of allies and adversaries. The Oromo struggle does not exist in isolation. It intersects with the struggles of the Somali, Sidama, Wolaita, and other nations. It engages with the Amhara political project, with movements for religious freedom, and with the international discourse on minority rights. To participate blindly, without mapping this terrain, is to navigate a minefield in the dark.

—

The Tools of Struggle: Armed Resistance, Civil Disobedience, and Political Engagement

The Oromo struggle has employed multiple modalities: armed resistance, civil disobedience, political party engagement, and international advocacy.

The informed participant must ask themselves: What is my role? Not everyone is called to the battlefield—whether literal or metaphorical. The liberation of a nation requires lawyers as much as it requires fighters, educators as much as activists, diplomats as much as demonstrators.

The participant should understand that these modalities are not mutually exclusive but often complementary. The armed struggle may create political space for negotiation, and civil disobedience may exert pressure that armed resistance cannot. Conversely, an over-reliance on any single approach can lead to stagnation or fragmentation.

—

The Ethical Dimension: Means and Ends

Perhaps the most overlooked aspect of political participation is ethics. The struggle for justice must be conducted justly.

The informed participant knows that violence against civilians, extrajudicial detention, and the suppression of internal dissent within Oromo ranks undermine the very legitimacy of the cause. They understand that the Oromo struggle is fundamentally a moral claim; if that moral claim is advanced through immoral means, it corrodes itself from within.

Moreover, the participant must be prepared for the long haul. The struggle is not a sprint; it is a marathon that may well outlast the participant’s lifetime. Patience, resilience, and the ability to sustain hope in the face of setbacks are not optional virtues—they are essential equipment.

—

The Personal Cost: What Participation Really Means

Participating in the Oromo struggle is not a badge of honor to be worn lightly. It carries real costs: the risk of imprisonment, the loss of employment, the strain on family relationships, the psychological toll of witnessing injustice and state violence.

The informed participant calculates these costs soberly. They do not romanticize martyrdom but prepare for the possibility of sacrifice. They build support networks. They plan for the psychological and material consequences of their involvement.

This is not a counsel of fear but of maturity. The struggle is too important to be undertaken by those who have not counted the cost.

—

Unity in Diversity: The Unfinished Conversation

Finally, the participant must understand that the Oromo struggle is not monolithic. There are debates—vigorous, sometimes bitter debates—about strategy, ideology, leadership, and the relationship with the Ethiopian state.

An informed participant enters these debates with humility and respect. They recognize that difference of opinion is not treachery, and that the movement’s strength lies in its ability to accommodate diverse voices while maintaining a common front on the fundamental principles: the inviolability of Oromia, the centrality of Afaan Oromo, the governance model of Gadaa, and the recognition of Finfinnee and Diree Dawa as integral to Oromo identity and Ethiopian federalism.

They understand that to participate is to contribute to an unfinished conversation—a conversation that will shape not only the future of the Oromo but the future of Ethiopia itself.

—

A Personal Reflection

As one elder activist put it, “The struggle is not about what we take from others; it is about what we build for ourselves and our children. It is about reclaiming our dignity and offering it as a gift to the nation we share.”

To participate in the Oromo struggle, then, is to embrace a profound responsibility. It is to carry the weight of history, to navigate the complexities of the present, and to dream, with clear eyes, a future of justice and peace.

The informed participant does not ask, What can the struggle give me? They ask, What can I give to the struggle—and through it, to Ethiopia?

—

In the words of a famous Oromo proverb: “Namni waan hin beekne hin dhaabatu”—One who does not know does not stand firm. In the Oromo struggle, knowledge is not just power; it is the very ground upon which one stands.