Reconciling Historical Claims and Democratic Principles in the Heart of Oromia

By Iyasu Enoro

In the ongoing discourse surrounding Finfinne—the city known internationally as Addis Ababa—a fundamental question persists: How do we reconcile the historical and indigenous rights of the Oromo people with the equal citizenship rights of all residents who now call the city home?

For the Oromo people, the answer is clear. Finfinne was established on Oromo land, and it remains an integral part of their historical and ancestral homeland. From this perspective, the concern is profound: some political actors are negotiating over what Oromos consider their own ancestral property, as if the land were a commodity to be traded rather than a sacred inheritance passed down through generations.

At the same time, international human rights principles demand equality and non-discrimination for all residents. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and other international instruments affirm that every person has equal rights—regardless of ethnicity, language, religion, or origin. These rights include equality before the law, freedom of expression, freedom of association, participation in public affairs, and the right to vote and be elected.

The question, then, is not whether these two sets of rights can coexist—they can, and they must. The question is whether there is the political will to recognize both.

The Oromo Position: An Ancestral Homeland, Not a Negotiable Asset

From the Oromo perspective, there is no need for negotiations or agreements regarding Finfinne. The city was not established on empty land; it was built on Oromo territory, and the Oromo people view it as part of their historical and ancestral homeland.

This is not a claim rooted in political expediency—it is rooted in history. Before the expansion of the Ethiopian Empire under Menelik II, the area now known as Finfinne was inhabited by the Oromo people. It was a place of springs, grazing lands, and cultural significance. The city’s very name, Finfinne, is Oromo—meaning “place of hot springs.”

The establishment of the city and the subsequent displacement of the Oromo people were acts of dispossession that have never been fully acknowledged or addressed. For the Oromo people, Finfinne is not a political bargaining chip—it is the heart of their homeland, the symbol of their historical connection to the land, and the future capital of a free Oromia.

The Principle of Equal Citizenship: Rights for All Residents

International human rights law is clear: all citizens are entitled to equal civil and political rights. No resident of Finfinne should be denied democratic participation, public services, employment opportunities, or legal protection on the basis of ethnic identity. All citizens living in Finfinne are entitled to equal treatment and equal participation in the city’s political and civic life.

This principle is non-negotiable. Whether a resident is Oromo, Amhara, Gurage, Tigrayan, or of any other background, they are entitled to the full protection of the law and the full rights of citizenship. Discrimination on the basis of ethnicity is a violation of the most fundamental human rights.

Applied to Finfinne, this means that every resident of the city—regardless of their origin—should enjoy equal rights. No resident should be made to feel like a second-class citizen. No resident should be denied access to public services, economic opportunities, or political participation.

Indigenous Rights: Acknowledging History and Ancestral Connection

While equal citizenship guarantees participation and protection under the law for everyone, it does not resolve questions concerning historical ownership, indigenous rights, or territorial status. These are distinct but equally important questions.

The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) affirms the importance of preserving indigenous peoples’ cultural identity, heritage, and historical connection to their ancestral territories. It recognizes that indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their distinct political, legal, economic, social, and cultural institutions.

Supporters of the Oromo position argue that the historical relationship between the Oromo people and the land on which Finfinne was built should be acknowledged and respected. This is not a rejection of the rights of other residents—it is a demand for historical justice and recognition.

International Examples: Coexistence of Indigenous and Citizenship Rights

Around the world, there are numerous examples where indigenous rights have been recognized without denying equal citizenship rights to other residents. These examples demonstrate that both sets of rights can coexist and that recognizing indigenous claims does not diminish the rights of others.

New Zealand: The Treaty of Waitangi

The Māori people are recognized as the indigenous people of New Zealand. The Treaty of Waitangi provides a foundation for protecting Māori rights, culture, and claims to ancestral lands while ensuring equal citizenship for all New Zealanders. Māori political representation, cultural preservation, and land claims are recognized alongside the full democratic rights of all citizens.

Canada: First Nations, Inuit, and Métis

In Canada, First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples possess constitutionally recognized indigenous rights. Land claims agreements and self-government arrangements acknowledge historical connections to traditional territories while cities and communities remain open to residents of all backgrounds. Indigenous rights and citizenship rights coexist within a framework of mutual respect.

Australia: The Mabo Decision

The High Court of Australia’s landmark Mabo decision rejected the doctrine of terra nullius (empty land) and recognized Native Title rights. Indigenous Australians gained legal recognition of their ancestral connection to land without affecting the equal civil and political rights of other Australians. This decision acknowledged historical injustice while affirming the rights of all citizens.

Norway, Sweden, and Finland: The Sámi People

The Sámi people are recognized as indigenous peoples with cultural, linguistic, and political rights in Norway, Sweden, and Finland. Sámi representative institutions exist alongside the democratic rights enjoyed equally by all citizens. This recognition has not diminished the rights of non-Sámi residents.

United States: Native American Tribes

Native American tribes in the United States retain certain rights related to self-government, culture, and ancestral territories. These rights coexist with the citizenship rights of all residents within the United States. Tribal sovereignty and individual citizenship rights are recognized as complementary, not contradictory.

A Common International Principle

These examples demonstrate a common international principle: recognizing indigenous peoples’ historical and ancestral connections to land does not require denying democratic, civil, or human rights to other residents. Rather, both sets of rights can coexist.

The recognition of indigenous rights does not create a hierarchy of citizenship. It acknowledges that some communities have a distinct historical relationship to a particular territory—a relationship that predates the current political order. This recognition is not a threat to equal citizenship; it is a complement to it.

The Challenge of Equality

Those who place themselves above others often find it difficult to accept genuine equality. Throughout history, dominant groups have resisted the recognition of indigenous rights, viewing it as a threat to their privileged position. But lasting peace and coexistence cannot be built on domination and denial.

From the Oromo perspective, the path forward requires recognizing both the equal rights of all residents and the legitimate historical and indigenous claims of the Oromo people. This is not a zero-sum game—both sets of rights can be honoured.

A Vision for Finfinne

Finfinne remains an integral part of Oromia. It is situated on Oromo land, and the Oromo people’s historical connection to the city must be acknowledged and respected. This recognition does not require the exclusion of other residents—it requires a new framework of coexistence based on mutual respect and justice.

Such a framework would include:

1. Recognition of Oromo Indigenous Rights: Formal acknowledgment of the Oromo people’s historical connection to the land on which Finfinne was established.
2. Equal Citizenship for All Residents: Guaranteed democratic participation, public services, and legal protection for all residents, regardless of ethnicity.
3. Shared Governance: Mechanisms for inclusive governance that ensure all residents have a voice in the city’s future.
4. Historical Justice: Addressing the historical dispossession of the Oromo people through acknowledgment, apology, and appropriate remedies.
5. Cultural Preservation: Support for the preservation and promotion of Oromo culture, language, and heritage within the city.

Conclusion: A Path to Lasting Peace

The recognition of indigenous rights and equal citizenship is not a contradiction—it is a foundation for lasting peace and coexistence. The international community has demonstrated that both sets of rights can be honoured, and the Oromo people are entitled to the same recognition.

Those who resist this recognition may see it as a threat to their position, but true peace cannot be built on denial and domination. Lasting peace requires acknowledging the truth of history, respecting the rights of all, and building a future based on justice.

From the Oromo perspective, Finfinne remains an integral part of Oromia—a sacred homeland that must be acknowledged, respected, and reclaimed. But this reclamation is not a rejection of others; it is an affirmation of the Oromo people’s right to their heritage, their identity, and their future.

Injifannoon Ummata Oromoo!

Finfinne haa jabaattu!

This feature article is dedicated to the Oromo people and all those who believe in the principles of justice, equality, and coexistence.